I. GENERAL

  • Buglea, C.-P. and A. Zăbrăuţanu. Instituţii ale globalizării in comerţul internaţional. Revista română de drept al afacerilor (Romania) 4:85-101, 2016. Translation of title: Institutions of globalization in international trade.
  • Glitz, F.E.Z. Lex mercatoria: .orden juridico autonomo? Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión (Asuncion) 5:9:196-223, 2017.
  • Mekong, M.L. Le CNUDCI a 50 ans. Justitia (Cameroon) 010:17-19, decembre 2017. At the occasion of a colloquium ≪ La Commission des Nations Unies pour le Droit Commercial International a 50 ans et l’arbitrage en Afrique ≫, 24 mai 2017, Cameroun.
  • Šafranko, Z. Tribute to UNCITRAL: the progressive development of the law of international trade – fifty years later. InterEU law east (Zagreb) 3:127-129, 2016.

II.INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION

  • Dridi, N. The enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Vietnam: overview and criticisms.Harvard international law journal (Cambridge, Mass.) 59:13-21, 2017.
  • Enaw, T. The enforcement of arbitral awards in harmonized legal systems: challenges in the application of the OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:1, January 2018.
  • Florescu, C.I. Introducere în probleme de etică privind arbitrii şi avocaţii în arbitrajul internaţional. Revista română de drept al afacerilor (Romania) 1:106-118, 2016. Translation of title: Introduction to ethics for arbitrators and lawyers in international arbitration.
  • Iwu, P.-A. International arbitration: transnational debate and ethics quagmire. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:1, January 2018.
  • Jiménez Piernas, C. and A.M. Aronovitz, eds. New trends in international economic law: from relativism to cooperation. Geneva, Schulthess, 2018. 292 p.
  • Kaména, B. L’exequatur des sentences arbitrales étrangères dans l’espace OHADA. Actualités du droit 15 janvier 2018.
  • Knieper, J. Investitionsschutzabkommen und Öffentlichkeit: die UNCITRAL-Transparenz-standards. Revista română de arbitraj (Bucureşti) 12:1:10-15, 2018. Translation of title: Investment treaties and public interest: the UNCITRAL transparency standards.
  • Rattanawut, J. and others. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in ASEAN countries. Journal of Southern technology (Thailand) 10:2:127-133, 2017. In Thai with English abstract.
  • Santacroce, F.G. Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: an analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 33:4:539-570, 2017.
  • Wolkewitz, M. Transparency and independence of arbitrators in investment arbitration: rule of law implications. European investment law and arbitration review online 1:1:288-301, 2016.

III. INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

  • Fontanelli, F. [et al.]. Lights and shadows of the WTO-inspired international court system of investor-state dispute settlement. European investment law and arbitration review online 1:1:191-263, 2016.
  • Jiménez Piernas, C. and A.M. Aronovitz, eds. New trends in international economic law: from relativism to cooperation. Geneva, Schulthess, 2018. 292 p.
  • Peterson, L.E. Analysis: what did governments agree (and disagree) on at recent UNCITRAL meetings on investor-State dispute settlement reform? Investment arbitration reporter (New York) 4 January 2018.